<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rachel Anne Scott &#187; Fringe 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rachelannescott.com/arts/tag/fringe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rachelannescott.com/arts</link>
	<description>theatrical artist in vancouver, bc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Plank finds Fun and Motivation at &#8220;Assembly&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2009/02/plank-finds-fun-and-motivation-at-assembly/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2009/02/plank-finds-fun-and-motivation-at-assembly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theatrical reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelannescott.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your Plank Panel seeking motivation:
<p>Ashleigh Dalton who likes to assemble puzzles, IKEA furniture and food such as lasagna
Rachel Scott who likes to assemble complex relationships, yoga sequences and logic traps</p>
<p>Who took in Radix Theatre’s Assembly, part of this year’s PuSh Festival.</p>
<p>Ashleigh: If you are looking for motivational seminars in Vancouver, a quick internet search shows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Your Plank Panel seeking motivation:</h3>
<p>Ashleigh Dalton who likes to assemble puzzles, IKEA furniture and food such as lasagna<br />
Rachel Scott who likes to assemble complex relationships, yoga sequences and logic traps</p>
<p>Who took in Radix Theatre’s Assembly, part of this year’s PuSh Festival.</p>
<p>Ashleigh: If you are looking for motivational seminars in Vancouver, a quick internet search shows as many as four occurring in this city on any given day. Assembly, presented by Radix Theatre as part of the PuSh Festival, began as most other motivational seminars, with the arriving participants (audience members) greeted, provided with nametags and shown to a hotel conference room, but became so much more. I don’t think any of us knew what quirky introspective fun we were in for. There was a hum in the conference room before the seminar started as people chattered over electronic-samba-meets-elevator-muzak background music, readjusted their nametags and waited for the expert-panel to take their stools at the front of the room.</p>
<p>Rachel: The concept was really fun. Since you mentioned the music, let me highlight that the sound design, by Stefan Smulovitz, was fantastic. Some moments were absolutely hilarious: the “electronic-samba” sound that you noted, or the over the top groovy yoga music that suddenly came on during an “audience introspection” moment. As the show evolved, the sound design became more subtle and evocative, which also helped our experience to evolve. The other technical elements of the production – Sean Lang’s video and photography, Itai Erdal’s lighting design – were similarly important in helping the audience feel where they were in terms of mood. During the piece, we did travel through several disparate and lovely worlds. The technical elements helped me stay oriented.</p>
<p>Ashleigh: Assembly is presented as an artistic exploration of “themes of wholeness and fragmentation, gathered around contemporary notions of body, mind and soul.” These notions were explored in varied and often bizarre ways that drew heavily on audience participation and engagement. I look at Assembly as having three segments: the self-improvement seminar, the surreal scene in the other room, and the actors’ monologues. Perhaps these three segments can be associated with the mind, body and soul, respectively.</p>
<p>Rachel: I hadn’t thought of it that way, but that’s a lovely way to describe it. It also could be seen as a classic birth, death and rebirth story. In the first phase, we are greeted with an identity. In the second phase, we enter the (tunnel, womb, birth canal – insert metaphor here), then we are re-birthed again as these new beings. But instead of evolving, the layers fell away. To be cute, they dis-assembled. The speakers let down their masks. We started with these charismatic, but ridiculous, motivational speakers and wound up connecting to some very personal stories. What was also interesting was that there was still a thru-line: there were still pieces of the motivational speakers in the final “human” monologues. But instead of presenting us with anecdotes of “we have the answer, you do not,” there was a feeling of connection and intimacy.</p>
<p>Ashleigh: I found the connection between performer and audience started right off the bat, when the actors asked everyone in the audience to think of, and call out, their deepest desires. A willing audience played along and revealed what they really wanted: more money, a woman to love, a cupcake. I was sold on the show the moment that the actors started incorporating random audience members into the seminar, calling them by name.</p>
<p>Rachel: That was so much fun. They really did put a lot of responsibility into the audience’s hands. There was a blurring of performance and reality, which I suppose there is in any motivational seminar! It felt as if anything could happen. I was made really aware of the “rules” I imposed upon myself to stay in my seat. The space seemed able to accommodate a lot of improvisation and misbehaviour. What did you think of the performances?</p>
<p>Ashleigh: I enjoyed all four actors, as they created the perfect characters – slightly clichéd and very much over-the-top – for a motivational talk. Emelia Symington Fedy particularly shone for me, with her contrast of tough chick attitude and her astonishing openness and vulnerability.</p>
<p>Rachel: I thought they all did a fantastic job. Not only did they strike this perfect comedic balance between absurd and real in the first section, but they were incredibly accessible in the final section. I think one of my favourite moments was Katy Harris-McLeod’s interpretive dance.</p>
<p>Ashleigh: My favourite moment of Assembly was when the four actors took turns saying what they hate about each other, and then what they love. Fit in amongst the parodies and fragmented stories, their words had a touching honesty that made the segment both funny and poignant. Real feelings and desires seemed to be revealed.</p>
<p>Rachel: Yes, the writing had the capacity to be both absurd and moving. Assembly was developed in four stages over the last three years. Under the stellar direction of Paul Ternes, I believe that the text was collectively developed by the performers themselves. There were only a couple moments that didn’t work for me. When our version of Tony Robbins, Andrew Laurenson, first says, “this is bullshit,” I didn’t really buy the switch. I think that was a hard corner to turn. And then there was the musical number, which didn’t have as much punch as it probably needed. But these are very minor glitches in an otherwise compelling and imaginative journey. Everyone should go see this. It rocked my socks off.</p>
<p>Assembly, Granville Island Hotel, Conference Room; Produced by Radix Theatre Society; Performers: Katy Harris-McLeod, Andrew Laurenson, Billy Marchesnski and Emilia Symington Fedy; Direction: Paul Ternes; Scenography &amp; Graphic Design: Andreas Kahre; Sound Design: Stefan Smulovitz; Video Design: Sean Lang; Costume Design: Robyn Volk; Lighting Design: Itai Erdal. For more information assemble yourself here, you’ll be glad you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2009/02/plank-finds-fun-and-motivation-at-assembly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trampoline Hall: Fun but not earth-shattering</title>
		<link>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2009/02/trampoline-hall/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2009/02/trampoline-hall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theatrical reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelannescott.com/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Trampoline Hall is a Toronto-based event consisting of lecturers presenting information about subjects that they are not experts in. This does not mean that the subjects are not well researched, however. The lecturers seem to have done varying degrees of preparation, ranging from a few pages of notes to an elaborate power point presentation. After [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trampoline Hall is a Toronto-based event consisting of lecturers presenting information about subjects that they are not experts in. This does not mean that the subjects are not well researched, however. The lecturers seem to have done varying degrees of preparation, ranging from a few pages of notes to an elaborate power point presentation. After the lectures, the audience had the chance for some Q&amp;A, which could be delightful test of the presenter’s ingenuity.</p>
<p>What made Trampoline Hall, which was featured as part of this year’s Club PuSh series, so much fun (and it was fun) was that it was so unexpected. The titles of the lectures gave some indication of what you were in store for, but could scarcely convey the range of information that the lecturer might include. Our lectures were “Fraternal Polyandry in Tibet,” “Cooking from Memory,” and “There are Clues Everywhere!! Nancy Drew Knows It’s Hard To Live In a Terrorized World. She Wants To Help You And She Can.” The audience would frequently draw links between the lectures and ask crossover questions, such as, “Would Nancy Drew consider having a polyandrous relationship with her boyfriend Ned and his brother?” (The answer was no. Ned does not have a brother.)</p>
<p>Trampoline Hall was less of theatrical piece and more of a carnival cultural event. The host, Misha, our barker, facilitated the questions and posed some of his own follow-ups. An energetic and extremely quick-witted comedian, he shone in the follow-ups, but his machine-gun fire exposition could be a little jarring.</p>
<p>The feeling of the night is probably summed up by the “set”, which consisted of Mark Delong and Shayne Ehman airbrushing children’s sweatshirts with pictures inspired by the lectures. Between lectures, they would launch these sweatshirts from the stage into the audience with various contraptions – and with varying degrees of success. The sweatshirts were unique, clever, and amusing, but there would be no point to keeping one if you caught it. Like the sweatshirts, the lectures were fun for a quick hit of random with a dash of contemplation, but they weren’t something that you needed to take home.</p>
<p>Trampoline Hall; Hosted by Misha Glouberman; Curated by Veda Hille; Set by Mark Delong and Shayne Ehman; Lecturers: Kevin Chong, Andrew Feldman, and Faith Moosang. It happened on February 1st, as part of Club PuSh, part of this year’s PuSh Festival:http://pushfestival.ca/index.php; both of which are still happening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2009/02/trampoline-hall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wonder of Wonders!  Musical of Musicals!  The Musical!</title>
		<link>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/wonder-of-wonders-musical-of-musicals-the-musical/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/wonder-of-wonders-musical-of-musicals-the-musical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theatrical reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelannescott.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Musical of Musicals: The Musical! is a hilarious must-see for all musical theatre lovers. Throughout the course of the show, our very talented cast takes us through several incarnations of the same plot – all performed in the styles of different composers. Stephen Sondheim, Andrew Lloyd Weber, and Rodgers and Hammerstein are a sampling of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Musical of Musicals: The Musical! is a hilarious must-see for all musical theatre lovers. Throughout the course of the show, our very talented cast takes us through several incarnations of the same plot – all performed in the styles of different composers. Stephen Sondheim, Andrew Lloyd Weber, and Rodgers and Hammerstein are a sampling of the genius you’ll see recreated  &#8211; and lovingly mocked &#8211; on stage.<br />
This show stands out because it is so technically demanding and so well done.  The performances are fantastic, the direction tight, and the accompaniment is flawless (thanks to Sarah Jaysmith).  The costumes and props give us the essence of the genres without being overdone or slowing down the action.  The excellent ensemble work by Mikal Grant, Steven Greenfield, Anna Kuman, and Colleen Winton is notable here in Fringe land, which thrives on a diet of one-person shows and duets.<br />
I should mention that I am a musical theatre lover and hold all things “jazz hands” close to my heart.  If you don’t know these composers, you will miss a lot of the jokes that make this piece so exceptionally funny.   But that’s no reason not to go.  The joy of watching four fabulous pros do their job is reason enough.<br />
Musical of Musicals: The Musical! was originally produced in New York City and written by Joanne Bogart and Eric Rockwell.  This production was directed by Ryan Mooney, accompanied and assistant musical directed by Sarah Jaysmith, and performed by Mikal Grant, Steven Greenfield, Anna Kuman, and Colleen Winton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/wonder-of-wonders-musical-of-musicals-the-musical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory Machine: Fantastic One-Woman Show</title>
		<link>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/memory-machine-fantastic-one-woman-show/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/memory-machine-fantastic-one-woman-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theatrical reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelannescott.com/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After Life was a riveting one-person show about three women who live at different times during the 20th century.  The success of this piece lay in Candy Simmon’s phenomenal acting and the tightness of the writing.  Simmons’s performance was exceptional, not because of her abundant technical abilities (she handles dialects from Appalachia, Minnesota, and New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Life was a riveting one-person show about three women who live at different times during the 20th century.  The success of this piece lay in Candy Simmon’s phenomenal acting and the tightness of the writing.  Simmons’s performance was exceptional, not because of her abundant technical abilities (she handles dialects from Appalachia, Minnesota, and New York City with ease), but because of her profound emotional connection to the characters.  The consistency of her presence, her formidable skill, and her relationship with the audience made this an outstanding piece of theatre.<br />
Virgina Scott’s efficient direction gave Simmons ample room to work and technical elements such as era-specific sound and photos were effective in supporting the journey.  The show, co-written by Simmons and Chris Van Strander, was impeccably structured with enough twists and turns to keep us on our toes.<br />
Enthralling, funny, smart, and poignant, After Life is an aria that you don’t want to miss.</p>
<p>After Life was written by Candy Simmons and Chris Van Stander, directed by Virginia Scott.</p>
<p>Review by Rachel Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/memory-machine-fantastic-one-woman-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gutenburg!  The Musical!  A Laugh Out Loud Romp</title>
		<link>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/gutenburg-the-musical-a-laugh-out-loud-romp/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/gutenburg-the-musical-a-laugh-out-loud-romp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theatrical reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelannescott.com/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I roared my pants off.  Come on, what isn’t inherently funny about a musical based on the supposed life and times of a medieval printing press inventor?  In this hour plus show, the co-creators of “Gutenberg! The Musical!” do their earnest and enthusiastic best to pitch their musical brainchild to us through performing a staged [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I roared my pants off.  Come on, what isn’t inherently funny about a musical based on the supposed life and times of a medieval printing press inventor?  In this hour plus show, the co-creators of “Gutenberg! The Musical!” do their earnest and enthusiastic best to pitch their musical brainchild to us through performing a staged reading, or rather, singing.  Between the two of them (with the help of hats), they play all of the characters, and even some wildlife.   The result is a cross between Spamalot and The Reduced Shakespeare Co. presents The Compleat Works Wllm Shkspr (abridged): improbable, irreverent, and hilarious. Originally written by Anthony King and Scott Brown of the Upright Citizens Brigade, it’s frankly pretty hard to steer this cruise ship wrong and much of the fun comes from the excellent writing.  Nathan Clark and Ken Lawson (who play Doug Simon and Bud Davenport, respectively) are savvy comedians who find a touching blend of showmanship and sincerity.  Their genuine and dedicated zeal for their project rounds out the slapstick humor with just enough heartwarming poignancy to be endearing.  There were performance lapses in the singing: Clark had the volume, but not the tone, while Lawson had the notes, but not always the volume.   I wanted more fullness in the musical numbers and there were moments where the action felt tired.  However, the clever directing and choreography helped us through the gaps and the brilliance of the script immediately made any necessary rebounds.   Fun, fun, very good fun.</p>
<p>Gutenberg!  The Musical! was originally produced by Trevor Brown at Jermyn Street Theatre, London.  Written by Anthony King and Scott Brown, Original Musical Direction and Arrangements by T.O. Sterrett.   Vancouver Fringe production directed by Brian Anderson, choreographed by Patrick Lambier, with Musical Direction by Ken Lawson.   Performed by Nathan Clark, Ken Lawson, and Matt Grinke (band).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/gutenburg-the-musical-a-laugh-out-loud-romp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory Machine: Bizarre and Courageous</title>
		<link>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/memory-machine-bizarre-and-courageous/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/memory-machine-bizarre-and-courageous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theatrical reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelannescott.com/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Memory Machine:  bizarre and courageous.
From the moment I walked into the theatre, I was fascinated. One of the lead actors was already onstage, strapped to a vertical bed, and lolling white-faced and open-mouthed to the sound of deep, interrupted breathing. Disturbed and weirdly captivated by the scene, I was curious about how this story would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memory Machine:  bizarre and courageous.<br />
From the moment I walked into the theatre, I was fascinated. One of the lead actors was already onstage, strapped to a vertical bed, and lolling white-faced and open-mouthed to the sound of deep, interrupted breathing. Disturbed and weirdly captivated by the scene, I was curious about how this story would unfold.<br />
As the piece moved forward, creators Saha Sajadieh and Parjad Sharifi continued to create a compelling creepy and sensual world. But although there were some gorgeous and disturbing moments, they were the lack of narrative structure created too much confusion to give these moments relevance.  The piece was too over-thought and self-conscious, lacking the action and momentum I needed to connect with the story.<br />
overwhelmed by the confusion.<br />
The languor of the pace frequently caused the tension to fall apart and the momentum to stop.  A few more anchors in reality would have helped me to stay invested in what was happening. As it was, the show was an occasionally compelling experiment that never coalesced into anything graspable. I absolutely loved their daring, but wanted more cohesion.<br />
Memory Machine was produced by Silen Marottes.  Written, directed, designed and performed by Sahar Sajadieh and Parjad Sharifi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/memory-machine-bizarre-and-courageous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dreams and Desires: Leaves Something To Be Desired</title>
		<link>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/dreams-and-desires-leaves-something-to-be-desired/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/dreams-and-desires-leaves-something-to-be-desired/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[theatrical reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelannescott.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barbara Bell both wrote and performed this one-woman show about a successful academic who must recover her past through the haze of fragmenting psyche. Obviously Bell put a lot of effort and love into this show, and she worked really hard to make the show come to life.  It is perhaps this very zeal, however, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara Bell both wrote and performed this one-woman show about a successful academic who must recover her past through the haze of fragmenting psyche. Obviously Bell put a lot of effort and love into this show, and she worked really hard to make the show come to life.  It is perhaps this very zeal, however, that worked against her.  The show was too technically driven and lacked an emotional authenticity with which I could connect.  I could practically see the acting beats in the script.  markings in the script defining the acting beats as they happened.  The pace of the acting was much, much too fast and the frenetic nature of our protagonist was a one-note song that grew very quickly exhausting.<br />
Why not show us the competent, grounded side of our heroine so that we have something to lose?  Bell did not seem grounded in her voice or her body, and she missed several lovely opportunities to connect with the audience by rushing and not really seeing us (or allowing herself to really be seen).  Her disconnection is why none of the humor inherent in the writing was realized.<br />
There were some exceptions, most notably when Bell was playing other characters.  The slower pace of these characters gave me a little room to breathe and be receptive.  In those calmer moments, there were glimmers of connectivity, which made me suspect that the acting problems were the result of poor choices rather than a lack of talent.  Although the plot was a little predictable, there was some lovely poetry underneath the acting and I wish that more had been done to reveal the text.<br />
I’m not sure what director Michael Catlin was going for, but every moment felt much too plotted and orchestrated. When the text is poetic, we need some stillness so that we can hear it.  This overly ornate style was also apparent in the lighting design, which was very dense and involved a lot of flickering and audience illumination.  Even the set felt overdone and self-conscious: three artfully placed theatrical spaces replete with coy red fabric and masks to act as other characters.<br />
The plot was predictable: a mystery painstakingly revealed in the hidden, flowery depths of a madwoman’s text.   But even though I found the storyline a little plodding, the real problem was the acting (and possibly by extension, the directing).<br />
Bell has obviously invested herself in this project enormously, and it could be the pressure of realizing her own script (her first) that has made this piece feel so overwrought and underfelt.  I would love to see her find more of the potential of her work.  Perhaps over the course of the Fringe, Bell will allow herself to relax in to the role more. Breathe.  Settle.  And just talk to us.</p>
<p>Dreams and Desires was produced by Shiny Object Creative.  Written and acted by Barbara Bell, directed by Michael Catlin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelannescott.com/arts/2008/09/dreams-and-desires-leaves-something-to-be-desired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

